|
Peggy
Noonan
Editorial-board member & columnist, Wall Street
Journal & author, most recently, of the upcoming When
Character Was King
Bush has really
become himself. I think all new presidents have to find themselves
within the presidency and become themselves within it and
then once they're themselves they sort of without trying give shape
and purpose to their presidency. Usually this happens over the first
year or two. With Bush it all happened in the past month. It's as
if he was given seven months to get comfortable in the new job,
and then he was handed a crisis of world-changing dimension and
forced to become the president he would become.
And now we
have him. He is: honest, self-trusting, compassionate, shrewd. He
goes by his gut, and is a Christian, a prayer who knows he is prayed
for. He wants the best to happen but seems to prepare for the worst.
He's had the roughest new presidency since Ronald Reagan. Reagan
got shot six weeks in and almost died; it's hard to start your presidency
while intubated. Bush came in and got World War III. I think Bush
is going to prove to be a great man. Last night in his news conference
he reminded me, again, of what Bob Bullock, the Texas Democrat who
ran the state legislature, said about him a few years ago, just
before Bullock died. He said of Bush, "He's going to be president
some day and he's going to be a great one." I think Bob Bullock
got Bush.
David
Limbaugh
Syndicated columnist & lawyer. Limbaugh is author
of Absolute
Power , about the Clinton-Reno Justice Department.
In his press
conference last night, President Bush continued on the high level
of performance he began following the 9-11 attacks. He persisted
in defining this war in moral terms and repeatedly referred to the
terrorists as “evil doers.” He reiterated his message that we are
not at war with Islam.
Bush was very
well prepared and conversant with all the details of the multifaceted
operation, and with other foreign-policy matters as well, e.g.,
the ABM Treaty and missile defense. He left no doubt that he is
in charge (the operation has his fingerprints all over it, even
down to his compassionate plan to send food packages to starving
children) and that he remains committed to the goals he laid out
in his speech to Congress. This is important because some believe
there have been mixed messages from the administration over whether
we would expand this campaign beyond Afghanistan. In his recent
pronouncements and very plainly tonight he indicated that he will
not permit Saddam Hussein to manufacture or possess weapons of mass
destruction or to abet terrorists. This is as important to eradicating
the terrorist threat as eliminating Osama and al Qaeda.
Bush is also
being very judicious in his public statements, careful not to telegraph
our every move and keeping the terrorists guessing which
is language they can understand. He is treating our press with respect,
but signaling that he will not compromise national security to satisfy
their craving for additional information.
Since 9-11
and including last night President Bush has silenced all but his
utterly intransigent critics. For all the planning Osama and his
henchmen did in preparation for this war, he may have made one fatal
error: listening to the mainstream media in the United States about
the respective prowess of various presidents. Don’t you know that
they are just kicking themselves in those caves right now for their
terrible timing in picking on the wrong cowboy?
Frank
J. Gaffney Jr.
President of the Center
for Security Policy
President
Bush's prime-time news conference last night confirmed an impression
indelibly made by his address to the Congress, the nation and the
world on September 20th: Against many people's expectations
including, frankly my own Mr. Bush is proving to be a Churchill
for our time.
It is not
simply that our president is, like Britain's great wartime leader,
the public face of the forces of good in a life-and-death struggle
with an unprecedented evil. While his words have yet to approach
Sir Winston's soaring rhetoric, his articulation of the dangers
we confront, the sacrifices required and his resolution to prevail
are decidedly Churchillian. So were the touches of humanity and
humor he injected to make a bit more bearable the difficult message
he conveyed.
Most striking
is that, unlike last month's speech before the Joint Session of
Congress powerfully delivered by Mr. Bush but crafted by
professional communicators last night it was him and him
alone who addressed us. In response to penetrating questions from
the White House press corps, he conveyed unmistakably a man authentically
rising to the occasion. It falls to us now to do as Churchill's
people did and prove worthy of our leader.
|