August 17, 2004,
The Super Bowl, the World Series, and March Madness all pulse with testosterone. But the Olympic Games with heart-wrenching stories of years of sacrifice for one moment of glory in Athens are ready-made for women. Not only do women account for more than half of the Olympics' television viewers, female athletes are Olympic stars. Networks cover women's gymnastics, diving, track, and swimming in primetime. The Olympic Games produce superstars like Kerri Strug, whose vault clinched the U.S gymnastic team a gold medal in 1996; and Marion Jones, who sprinted to five medals in 2000.
These female Olympians deserve to be celebrated: Their hard work will inspire many young girls to participate in sports. This decision can have an important impact: Female athletes have higher graduation rates, are less likely to have unwanted pregnancies, and report higher levels of self-esteem. Sports similarly benefit boys and may play an important role in helping them socialize and form positive relationship with their peers. That's why girls and boys should both be encouraged to participate in athletic activity at early age.
Unfortunately, instead of just encouraging participation in sports, the federal law known as Title IX pits our male and female athletes against each other. Under this regime, it's not just female athletes' progress that's celebrated, but the elimination of male athletes.
Consider a Washington Post Olympic preview entitled "Female Athletes Continue to Gain Ground" written in April 2004. The article celebrated that nearly equal numbers of men and women an estimated 282 men and 263 women will represent the United States in Athens. It goes on to note that in the last summer Olympics, the U.S. sent 338 men and 264 women to compete.
Should these numbers really be cited as evidence of progress for women? The number of women competing was essentially unchanged. The so-called victory for women was the elimination of more than 50 male athletes from the U.S. roster.
This mentality comes as no surprised to those familiar with the application of Title IX. This federal law was intended to prevent discrimination based on sex on college campuses, including athletics, but has since become a death sentence for many male sports teams. The only sure-fire way for colleges and universities to avoid potentially costly litigation is to make their rosters "proportional" to their enrollment. Since women account for about 56 percent of undergraduates (and there has been no outcry about the "lack of proportionality" in college enrollment) at many campuses, women need to account for more than half of all athletes.
Female athletes are not celebrating the loss of male teams. Cyndi Gallagher, UCLA swimming coach, described the positive affects of having the men and women train together on her female athletes: "When we had a men's team, we were always in the top 10." In 1994, UCLA dropped men's swimming and diving programs, which has produced 16 Olympians. Gallagher's conflicted feelings reveal how Title IX has drifted away from its core mission: "I fully support Title IX. But choosing to drop men's programs is not what Title IX wants."
Title IX was supposed to ensure that women have the opportunity to participate in athletics. Instead, by focusing on equality of outcomes, it has made college athletics a zero sum game: women only win if men lose. It's time for common-sense reform to the application of Title IX that allows for greater participation by both men and women in athletics. That way, male and female athletes alike can come out winners.
Carrie Lukas is the director of policy at the Independent Women's Forum.