|
his morning Timothy
McVeigh, white male, was executed. The execution came on the heels
of a Department of Justice report released last week that scrutinized
the federal death penalty system for evidence of racial bias.
National Review’s ideological counterpart, The New Republic,
has a standard feature where it presents dueling headlines. Readers
send in two headlines describing the same news event (sometimes
even in the same paper) but with diametrically opposed takes on
the same story. Here’s my nomination: Last week Foxnews.com announced
“No Racial Bias in Application of Death Penalty, Feds Say,” while
Newsmax.com declared “Federal Death Penalty Biased Against Whites.”
The federal study augmented data in an earlier, September 12, 2000
report, but reached similar conclusions. The broader pool found
that federal prosecutors brought cases against 973 defendants in
the 1995 to July 2000 period in which the facts would have supported
a capital charge. Of these defendants, 17 percent (166) were white,
42 percent (408) were black, and 36 percent (350) were Hispanic.
So, in this pool, blacks and Hispanics were “overrepresented” and
whites “underrepresented” compared with their respective makeups
in the general population.
But, out of this pool, capital charges were actually brought less
frequently against blacks (79 percent of the time) and Hispanics
(56 percent of the time) than against whites (81 percent of the
time). Finally, the report found that the attorney general approved
seeking the death penalty for only a modest 17 percent of the black
defendants (71 out of 408), and a paltry 9 percent of the Hispanic
defendants (32 out of 350), versus a whopping 27 percent of white
defendants (44 out of 166).
So you can see that death row can be viewed by civil-rights advocates
as half empty or half full, if I may engage in a bit of gallows
humor. James Alan Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University,
says that the survey does little to answer basic question of bias,
according to the Washington Post. “The prosecutorial decision-making
here is what needs to be reviewed,” he said. “The problem may well
be at the front end, and this seems to ignore that.” But that depends
on what the scope of the study was supposed to be finding
bias once the capital cases had been brought, or finding it at the
initial stage, too.
The study may not have addressed the latter point, but the fact
that blacks and Hispanics are charged with capital crimes out of
proportion to their numbers in the general population may simply
mean that blacks and Hispanics commit capital crimes out
of proportion to their numbers. And, of course, they do. Randall
Kennedy, an African-American Harvard Law School professor, and Professor
Michael Tonry, a leading liberal expert on sentencing, acknowledge
the high rate of black street crime.
The fact is that capital criminals don’t look like America, and
no one should expect them to. No one is surprised to find more men
than women in this class. Nor is it a shock to find that this group
contains more twenty-year-olds than septuagenarians. And if
as the left tirelessly maintains poverty breeds crime, and
if as it tiresomely maintains the poor are disproportionately
minority, then it must follow as the left entirely denies
that minorities will be “overrepresented” among criminals.
Heather Mac Donald sums up the figures that bear all this out: “Males
between the ages of 14 and 24, less than 8 percent of the population,
commit almost half the nation’s murders; black males of the same
age, less than 1 percent of the population, committed some 30 percent
of the country’s homicides in the 1990s.”
Finally, it must be noted that, even if a disproportionate number
of African Americans are executed, the beneficiaries of the executions
are likely to be disproportionately black, too. Consider: In the
last three years for which FBI statistics are available, there were
almost as many blacks murdered as whites (an annual average of 7316
versus 7358), even though there are over six-and-a-half times as
many whites in the country. If the death penalty deters murderers,
then it serves the interests of the overwhelming majority of (law
abiding) African Americans more handily than the interests of all
those rich whites in their gated communities.
No one seriously believes that Timothy McVeigh is being put to death
because he is a white male. He is being executed because he is a
cold-blooded killer, with the reasonable hope that his death will
advance the safety and security of the rest of us, whatever our
skin color. The same is true for the other cold-blooded killers
being put to death.
|