|
resident
George Bush must stop kowtowing to monarchs and dictators in Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, and Egypt. He must stop blowing kisses at
the Palestinian Authority, Syria, and Iran. They're terrorist states.
Whether he's
doing this to keep Arab oil flowing to the U.S., to include Arab
and Muslim nations in the antiterrorism coalition, to show widespread
opposition to the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, or for whatever reason
the fact is that these regimes are not reliable allies. Some
are sworn enemies. Virtually all of them are breeding grounds for
terrorists. Conversely, Israel is the only democracy in the Middle
East, and America's staunchest friend in the region.
President Bush
knows America and Israel have a special relationship. When he was
seeking the presidency last year, he gave an important speech on
May 22, 2000, to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Conference.
He said, in part:
America and
Israel have a special friendship. In fact, it's more than a friendship.
America and Israel are brothers and sisters in the family of democracy,
natural allies natural allies in the cause of peace.
The family
of democracy transcends borders and oceans. What unites us is
a powerful conviction, perhaps the greatest of all convictions.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness."
Clearly suggesting
that his approach to Israel would differ from Bill Clinton's heavy-handedness,
in which Clinton exerted great pressure on Israel to bend to the
demands of the Palestinians in reaching a legacy-building peace
deal, Bush also said:
...I recognize
the importance of the peace process and the key role that the
United States can play. But my support for Israel is not conditional
on the outcome of the peace process."
America's
special relationship with Israel precedes the peace process. And
Israel's adversaries should know that in my administration, the
special relationship will continue, even if they cannot bring
themselves to make true peace with the Jewish state.
And he didn't
stop there. Knowing full well that moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem
would infuriate the Palestinians, as they claim part of that city
as their own, Bush nonetheless said:
...As soon
as I take office, I will begin the process of moving the United
States ambassador to the city Israel has chosen as its capital.
A mere 15 days
after taking office, Bush broke his word. On ABC's news program
This Week, his secretary of state, Colin Powell, said that
there were no immediate plans to move the U.S. embassy from Tel
Aviv, but the new administration was "studying it."
On CNN's Late
Edition, Bush's national-security adviser, Condoleezza Rice,
repeated Powell's assertion:
Part of the
process will be to talk to friends in the region to assess the
possibilities of doing this. But the commitment remains. The question
of exactly when and now, I think, has to be judged within the
context in which we find ourselves.
And during
his presidency, while scores of Israelis including an Israeli
cabinet minister have been murdered by Palestinian terrorists,
Bush and his advisers have demanded that Israel show "restraint"
and return to the peace table.
But nothing
surpasses the temerity of Bush's statement on October 2, 2001:
The idea
of a Palestinian state has always been part of a vision, so long
as the right to Israel to exist is respected.
Bush's statement
is demonstrably false. The only previous president to endorse a
Palestinian state was Bill Clinton, and he only did so at the end
of his presidency. Ronald Reagan, for example, rejected it out of
hand. Look how far Bush has retreated in such a short period of
time.
Moreover, the
Bush Doctrine, born from the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, provides that terrorists and states that sponsor terrorism
are enemies of the civilized world, and that they must be defeated.
And as recently as November 6, 2001, Bush said:
Later this
week at the United Nations, I will set out my vision of our common
responsibilities in the war on terror. I will put every nation
on notice that these duties involve more than sympathy or words.
No nation can be neutral in this conflict, because no civilized
nation can be secure in a world threatened by terror...
Why, then,
does Bush demand that Israel not respond to terrorism but, in fact,
that it negotiate with terrorists and those who harbor them? Why
the double standard for a nation with which, as Bush said, we have
a "special relationship?"
And there's
one other point. President Bush has repeatedly asked Americans to
be respectful and tolerant of the Muslim community. He has made
clear that we are not at war with Islam, but with terrorists. These
are wise and laudable ideals. Yet Bush has been completely silent
about anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic comments that have become more
rabid since September 11 both here and abroad. I'm sure if
he asked, his press office could gather the myriad of published
articles proving the point. In any event, here's a small sampling:
* The Chicago
Sun-Times has reported:
From Cairo
to Kuwait and Damascus to Dushanbe, Muslims have singled out the
Jewish state as the unseen hand behind the September 11 terrorist
attacks.
In casual
conversations, newspapers and Internet chat rooms, many in the
Muslim world are endlessly chewing over and recycling unsubstantiated
rumors that implicate Israel. They're saying, for example, that
[f]our thousand Jews who worked at the World Trade Center were
mysteriously absent the day hijackers crashed two airliners into
the towers [and that a] group of five Jews was arrested shortly
after the attacks after they were spotted videotaping the crashes
from a New York rooftop and dancing in jubilation.
Typical is
an editorial in the Syria Times. It named Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon as the brains behind the September 11 horror.
"Sharon is known for his experience in masterminding and
carrying out massacres and collective killings. The recent attacks
are actually acts of professional criminals like Sharon and his
ilk."
* It has been
widely reported that an exhibit at An-Najah University in Nablus
reenacted the August 9, 2001, slaughter of innocent people in Israel
by a Palestinian suicide bomber at a Sbarro pizzeria, which killed
15, including two Americans. The exhibit included a replica of the
restaurant with the Hebrew letters "kosher," a student
setting up a fake explosion, and a student dressed as a terrorist
with the Koran in one hand and a rifle in the other.
* The former
Imam of the Islamic Cultural Center of New York, Sheik Muhammad
Al-Gamei'a, complaining about the treatment of Muslims in America
after September 11, said:
Muslims do
not feel safe even going to hospitals because some Jewish doctors
in one of the hospitals poisoned sick Muslim children, who then
died.
* Salam Al-Marayati,
executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, and among
the Muslim leaders Bush invited to the White House, said, before
the identification of the September 11 hijackers was known:
If we're
going to look at suspects, we should look to the groups that benefit
the most from these kinds of incidents. I think we should put
the state of Israel on the suspect list because I think this diverts
attention from what's happening in the Palestinian territories.
* When New
York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani rejected Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin
Talal's $10 million donation after the prince implied that the terrorist
attacks were related to U.S. policy in the Middle East, the prince
said:
The whole
issue is that I spoke about their position [on the Mideast] and
they didn't like it because there are Jewish pressures and they
were afraid of them.
Guiliani rejected
the prince's statement as nonsense.
* It was recently
reported that for 50 years, the International Federation of Red
Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Geneva, and now apparently members
of the American Red Cross's board, oppose full federation membership
for the Magen David Adom (Israel's Red Cross), because it uses the
Red Shield of David as its symbol.
Bush's condemnation
of racism and bigotry is laudatory, but it's incomplete. It is imperative
that he speak out against all voices of hatred, including
those aimed at Jews and the Jewish state.
President Bush's
leadership during these difficult times has been extraordinary.
I was, and am, an ardent supporter. But there's a disturbing inconsistency
in both the application of his antiterrorism doctrine and his rhetoric
of tolerance and compassion.
|