| 3/31/00
5:10 p.m. Audit Fever Look out if you're not in a Clinot-Gore state. By NR's Kate Dwyer, Ramesh Ponnuru & John J. Miller |
|
|
|
The authors conducted a statistical analysis on the audit rate by geographic region, taking into account variables that might account for why Nevada has so many returns reviewed (2 percent) compared to Kentucky (0.3 percent). These factors include the per-capita number of revenue agents in each district and the greater use of the EITC in relatively poor states two variables IRS defenders have cited as possible explanations for the variations. The researchers also figured in gambling activity risk-taking behavior that might attract IRS attention to a particular region. While the analysis shows that these explanations have merit, it also uncovered political bias. Specifically, authors Jim Couch, Keith Atkinson, Tommie Singleton, and Pete Williams conclude: "[T]he IRS audits fewer returns in states whose representatives are members of congressional committees charged with IRS oversight. In addition, taxpayers in those states that gave Clinton greater political support were subjected to significantly fewer audits. Using 1995 audit rate data from the 63 IRS districts across the nation, we find that political factors offer significant explanatory power. In particular, a 10 percent increase in the vote for Clinton in the 1992 presidential election led to a 0.1 percent reduction in returns audited from the state." Read the whole study online at: cato.org. Baseball
Picks 2000 Here's NR's annual installment of baseball predictions:
|