August 30, 2004,
8:36 a.m. May I tell you what my now-most-hated journalistic genre is? The piece by the New Yorker who says, "Boy, these dolts from Flyover Land don't have a clue. Here's how you gotta behave in New York, buddy or else!" There have been roughly 8.5 million of these pieces published in the last couple of weeks; each one of them has been nauseating. It's enough to make me want to order a pastrami sandwich on white bread, with mayo. I vowed, when I moved here years ago, that I would never become that kind of New Yorker, even if I stayed here till I reached 102 the kind that sneers at everyone else as a provincial. Of course, in one breath, these New Yorkers say that their city is the most tolerant, most diverse place in the world, the place where you can be whatever you want to be; and in the next breath they say, "Don't you dare eat white bread," or "Don't you dare say 'Greenwich Village' [instead of merely "the Village"]," or "Don't you dare wear lime-green pants." Some tolerance; some diversity. When the Republicans chose New York as the site of their convention, so long ago, it seemed like a good idea. That was before the anti-war movement got going and the Democratic party got Fahrenheited. 'Bout now, San Diego or Salt Lake City is sounding pretty good to me, for a GOP convention. Many New Yorkers seem to feel that they have to do everything possible to tell the delegates, and the world at large, that they hate Republicans. I have a message for them: We know. We know.
That's the spirit. Shortly after Sept. 11 I mean for like two seconds New York was as American and determined as any other town. That seems like an eternity ago. It is barely a dream.
Enjoy a letter from a reader: "Dear Jay: As a West Point grad (1978), I say, bring down the West Point Glee Club to take up the slack. They are just up the road and are just now reporting in from their summer assignments. They won't even have trouble singing 'Anchors Aweigh,' although they might have to rinse with Listerine afterward. (You know, the whole Army-Navy thing.)"
I wonder.
Now, oddly, he's used as a club to beat Bush with: Arnold the wise, popular moderate, deigning to help Bush a little bit by speaking at the convention, but not too much, by campaigning for him elsewhere. Oh-why-oh-why can't the rest of the GOP be like that good, tolerant, gay-loving, abortion-condoning Arnold? And two seconds ago, he was a mindless, drooling beast. Funny.
Well, you could look at it that way. Or, more generously, you could say that the GOP is the more tolerant, more diverse party. Would an anti-abortion speaker be permitted at a Democratic convention? Who pitches the bigger tent? And the media like to stress the areas of disagreement between Bush and pick one McCain, Giuliani, Pataki, Bloomberg. Actually, the one big issue of 2004 the one big issue of this age is the War. Where do you stand? Do we prosecute it the Bush way? Or do we go back to law enforcement go back to our responses, or non-responses, to the '93 World Trade Center bombing, Khobar Towers, the African-embassy attacks, etc. as Kerry promises? And on the One Big Issue, these moderate Republicans are foursquare behind Bush.
Of course they haven't. They meet the American Left. They must wonder how a conservative ever gets elected. It would almost be like meeting exclusively anti-socialist Frenchmen here in the United States (and, yes, I meant to have that "s" in socialist lowercase both the Conservatives and the Socialists in France are socialist). Anyway, this is leading up to something: I'm going to write more expansively about this subject, of being a Republican abroad, or observing the behavior of Democrats abroad. Do you have something to relate? Please let me know at jnordlinger@nationalreview.com. Thanks.
And, hey: Wasn't it Ashcroft who was supposed to be preventing us from reading books? Wasn't he instituting the new Salem? Anyway, I received many letters from readers detailing their own trouble with bookstores, e.g., in trying to buy Unfit for Command. I will publish an amazing letter (not related to this book) below. Do you have your own experience, or experiences, to share? I would like to know jnordlinger@nationalreview.com. Thanks again.
But check this out, kiddies: The chairman of the political science department of course the Observer says "chair" Daniel Levine, "has little sympathy for conservative students who incur the wrath of their classmates." He says, "If I would've announced myself as Students for Apartheid in South Africa, I would've gotten a negative reaction too." Consider that. Consider that long. Forgetting the insult the chairman of the political science department of the University of Michigan equates us Republicans with apartheidniks what about the grammar? What about the English? "If I would've . . . I would've . . ." (This is a scourge of the modern age: The correct construction is, of course, "If I had . . . I would have . . .") This is exactly the University of Michigan I know. It's not enough that they're stiflingly left-wing they're stupid, too. Left-wing and stupid, a lethal combination. I've never been to the place, but, in my imagination, at Bennington or Reed College they're stiflingly left-wing but not stupid!
Some lyrics: She had hair under her arms And hair on both her legs, And her hate for you was never-ending. She was socially aware, yes, And I really couldn't care less, But her chest kept me pretending. She always said that she wished you were dead, And I nodded so she'd shut up and hop into bed. But that's the part that I'm sorry for now Because I love you more than I loved her anyhow. It's my new favorite song. And, if I've read their website correctly, these guys have got a couple of songs about WFB coming out soon! A dream come true.
You betcha, baby! As I say in NR, I believe music in America would struggle on, even without the services of Donald Runnicles. And I have a list of other musicians whom I might like to see leave the country! Just in case anybody asks!
I mention this because pro-choicers often like to say that they're not enthusiastic about abortion, that they consider it a great sadness, blah, blah, blah. And then, "Abort Bush . . .!" They don't seem too sad! And may I register one language note? (Well, I guess I've already had one, but anyway . . .) You've seen that film of young John Kerry, testifying before the Senate and denouncing American soldiers as war criminals, baby-killers, etc.? (Remember when liberals thought baby-killing was bad?) Anyway, he pronounces "Genghis Khan" with a soft "G" like Jenghis. Now, I don't know how Mr. Khan himself pronounced his first name or what Mama Khan said. I don't know how they taught the pronunciation at St. Paul's and Yale. But I had never in my life, before seeing this film, heard "Jenghis." I'm out except for that promised letter: Mr. Nordlinger: |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||