September 22, 2004,
9:42 a.m. If John Kerry's skin were any thinner, he would seem contained by Saran Wrap. Criticize the Democratic presidential nominee to any degree, and he responds as if gravely and unfairly wounded, even if he threw the first punch. "The Bush campaign and its allies have turned to the tactics of fear and smear because they can't talk about jobs, health care, energy independence and rebuilding our alliances," Kerry whined at Cooper Union College in New York on August 24, soon after the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth began broadcasting torpedoes below Kerry's water line. Never mind that Kerry himself placed a mine downstream from President Bush's reelection juggernaut more than six months earlier: "The issue here, as I have heard it raised, is was he [Bush] present and active on duty in Alabama at the times he was supposed to be," John Forbes Kambodia complained last February 8. "Just because you get an honorable discharge does not in fact answer that question." Kerry now cries anew, like a toddler deprived of his ice cream. Vice President Dick Cheney told Des Moines voters on September 7, "It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on November 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice, then the danger is that we'll get hit again, and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States, and that we'll fall back into the pre-9/11 mindset, if you will, that in fact these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts, and that we are not really at war. I think that would be a terrible mistake." Rather than explain how his self-described "law-enforcement" approach would keep Americans from being killed by Islamofascists, Kerry nearly collapsed with the vapors. "George Bush and Dick Cheney are engaging in shameful and irresponsible and outrageous behavior in trying to play the politics of fear and exploit the war on terror," Kerry bellyached to the Associated Press on September 9. A day earlier, he moaned about Bush and Cheney on WCCO-TV in Minneapolis. The GOP nominees, according to Kerry, "will say anything and do anything in order to get elected. And it is outrageous and shameful to make the war on terror an instrument of their politics in this race." One could empathize with Kerry had he studiously circumscribed the war on terror as off limits in the presidential race. Of course, that's not so, nor should it be. The war on terror is the issue this year, and both Bush and Kerry owe the American people their individual visions for how they would crush Islamic murderers like cockroaches, at home and abroad. Bush agree or disagree embraces his defeat of Kabul's al-Qaeda-loving Taliban and Baghdad's terrorist-nurturing Baathist regime. Bush also can highlight the Patriot Act, the Department of Homeland Security, and by Heritage Foundation scholar Ed Meese's estimate some 40 terrorist acts stymied by cops, spies, and soldiers before anyone got blown to pieces. Kerry can point to...what? The Massachusetts Democrat already has politicized the war on terror. He is no purer here than the gal on the street corner in high heels, Spandex pants, and smeared rouge who decries the salty taunt of her soon-to-be client. Just listen to Kerry himself:
But Kerry politicized the war on terror far earlier than last month.
"John Kerry has politicized the war on terror at every turn, regularly abandoning his previous positions for a new, more politically expedient viewpoint," says Scott Stanzel, Bush-Cheney's quick-witted spokesman. Kerry has every right to debate his differences on the war on terror with the Bush-Cheney team, so long as he takes it like a man when they return the favor. |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||