iberals
view conservatives as nothing but shills for the wealthy. Whatever
tax cuts rich people and big corporations want, liberals believe,
conservatives will automatically support no matter how unjustified
economically. Furthermore, they think conservatives know such tax
cuts are unfair, but support them because they have been bought off
with contributions. In short, conservatives are hypocrites whose position
on taxes is governed solely by greed, liberals believe.
Of course,
this caricature is a lie. Conservatives support tax cuts because
they favor small government, and they genuinely believe that high
taxes on corporations and the wealthy hinder investment, growth,
and jobs. But, sadly, they sometimes give liberals evidence for
the caricature, as when Republicans in the House recently rammed
through, with virtually no scrutiny, a huge tax rebate for big corporations
that is unsupported by economic analysis.
Conservative
criticism of the House Republican tax bill has been muted because
many take the position that all tax cuts are per se good.
But that is not true. Some tax cuts can be damaging to the economy
by distorting investment and production decisions. In any case,
even if one believes that all tax cuts are good, it is obviously
not the case that all tax cuts are equally good. Some clearly are
better than others.
By failing
to distinguish between good and bad tax cuts, conservatives have
found themselves on a slippery slope where tax credits and rebates
are seen as no different than cuts in marginal tax rates. The marginal
rate is the tax that applies to each additional dollar earned. Hence,
it is the critical tax rate for deciding whether to increase one's
work, savings, or investment. Moreover, marginal tax-rate cuts are
always forward-looking, because they affect only incremental economic
activity. By contrast, tax rebates have no incentive effects at
all, and tax credits are much inferior to tax-rate reductions.
Once upon
a time, conservatives were comfortable arguing for tax rate reductions
because they understood incentive effects. But somewhere along the
way, they forgot their supply-side economics and became lazy. Now
they no longer know how to respond appropriately when liberals attack
them for cutting the top tax rate just to benefit their wealthy
campaign contributors. As a result, conservatives compromised, pushing
ill-conceived tax credits and rebates instead of tax-rate reductions.
This was extremely
unwise. Tax credits not only have weak or even nonexistent incentive
effects, but they are too much like government spending. Soon, tax
credits for those who pay taxes morphed into "rebates" for those
who pay none. It may be necessary at times to give money to those
with no tax liability, but to call such payments "tax rebates" is
Orwellian doublespeak. It is a distortion of the language that makes
welfare and tax cuts indistinguishable.
We have already
seen President Bush's modest tax-rate reduction converted into a
de facto spending program through this method. But at least he limited
earlier tax rebates to those who actually paid taxes last year.
Now, as a stimulus measure, he has endorsed another round of rebates
for those with no income tax liability at all, even though there
is no evidence whatsoever that rebates raise consumption or growth.
Once the linkage
between tax cuts and tax liabilities for individuals was destroyed,
the next step was to extend this logic to corporations, as well.
Thus House Republicans made rebates to corporations for past-paid
alternative minimum taxes the centerpiece of their stimulus plan.
But there is not the slightest reason to believe that sending rebate
checks to corporations will do any more to stimulate growth than
those to individuals.
Since there
is no economic rationale for the House plan, liberals are free to
assume that it is simply payback for corporate campaign contributions.
Left-wing groups like Citizens for Tax Justice are having a field
day making this argument. Republican supporters of the corporate
rebates implicitly concede the truth of this attack by failing to
offer any kind of serious economic justification for their action.
There is a
good case that can be made for reducing taxes on investment in order
to boost the economy. And there is a very strong case for abolishing
the alternative minimum tax on corporations, and indeed the corporate
income tax itself. But that case has not been made by those pressing
the corporate rebate plan. As a result, not only will they lose
legislatively in the end, but they have handed their enemies a potent
political issue. They are, in effect, confirming the liberal caricature
of conservative tax policy.
|