n
Tuesday, both Treasury Undersecretary John Taylor and sources from
the IMF expressed
views on Argentina's all-important dollarization/devaluation decision.
An IMF source said that
the Fund wanted Argentina to either dollarize or devalue and had written
a letter to Argentina to that effect. In a CNBC interview, Taylor
seemed to oppose devaluation. The Wall Street Journal's editorial
page interpreted him as supporting dollarization, while not having
the U.S. push for it.
Such high-level
pressure on Argentina to break the currency impasse is a positive
development because it might result in dollarization before it is
too late. The currency board has stopped working properly, and is
delivering astronomical interest rates and capital flight.
That the U.S.
Treasury and the IMF are raising the possibility of dollarization
is, by far, the better alternative. By eliminating currency risk
and ending the uncertainty over the peso, Argentina would begin
to see a return of flight capital. Interest rates would fall, leaving
room for economic growth. Tax receipts would improve, because delinquency
would no longer be valuable as a hedge against devaluation.
Conversely,
a devaluation would be devastating for Argentines and for Argentina's
political and social fabric (given Argentina's decade long moral
and legal commitment to the peso/dollar peg). It would push the
banking system toward default and will further lower the value of
debt and equities in both Argentina and Brazil, pushing Argentina
quickly into default.
The IMF recalled
the head of its team from Buenos Aires to review the weekend's banking
and capital control regulations. The team was in Buenos Aires to
review the state of the country's IMF program and consider whether
to approve a $1.27 billion loan installment. If the IMF is serious
about forcing a currency decision, look for the IMF installment
to be held up. Faced with the law and the high costs of devaluation,
it looks like Argentina will choose to dollarize.
|