Meantime, the scandal inspires various contemplations cultural, theological, and cosmic. First off, the uproar indicates that some traditional moral standards still hold sway with most Americans. While there truly is such a thing as pedophilia chic, which seems to have infected some priests, one of whom famously stated that it is "the children who seduce the adults," for most people the idea of a male priest preying on younger male parishioners is the stuff of which jail terms should be made. There also seems to be a widely held belief that those who knew about these predations, and protected the perpetrators, are guilty of conspiracy and are thus worthy of some type of lashing, at the very least removal from office. All of which, as they say on the Rosie show, is very judgmental. But sometimes nothing else will do. Indeed, the ferocity with which these judgments are made, across the cultural array, suggests that Americans have been looking for a good target for moral shelling and now that they have one they're very happy to bounce the rubble, again and again. This is one of the rare times when younger Americans have seen society embrace a traditional moral consensus. They never knew the time when the vast majority of citizens took their cues, at least publicly, from the Old and/or New Testament. One simply didn't argue, for instance, that homosexuality was in any sense morally equal with heterosexuality. Quite the contrary. The OT cure for sexual license of any type was a shower of stones. New Testament believers noted their Messiah considered it a sin to even think of having sex with another man's wife. One could draw but one reasonable conclusion as to how He would view a dalliance between Peter and Paul. All of that has been swept away, very quickly and dramatically. Recent stories indicate that a prime candidate for a leading job at Stanford University was disqualified because of his traditional sexual views, which were based on his religious beliefs. This fellow wasn't trying out for a job at the English Department; he wanted to be a football coach. The Boy Scouts lose funding from the United Way because they adhere to their sexual traditions. In general, anyone who fails to address the subject in the proper tones and terms is rewarded with an instant diagnosis of being phobic that is, mentally unstable. One is reminded of the good old days when dissenters from the official Soviet line were deemed insane. Those who see a Divine
Comedy at work in all things human can only sit and marvel. Moral codes
that have been in effect for thousands of years, and which are widely
assumed (in America, at least) to have come from On High are amended by
transitory scribes who take their cues from more mundane sources
various impulses, glands, intuitions, pamphlets. Their revisions are given
great weight increasingly, the weight of law. Those prone to despair
over these developments find little cause for cheer, other than in news
that a killer asteroid is set to strike the Earth in 870 years or so.
Dave Shiflett is coauthor of Christianity on Trial. |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||